5/1/2023 0 Comments The next big thing 2015This limitation is why humans are still a necessary cog in the data analysis that many supercomputers conduct today. That is to say they cannot apply salience to discrete observations they make that have not been made important to them by their code. Unlike humans, computers cannot analyze data beyond the parameters set in their code. This important factor is the method in which we are teaching computers to collect and process data. However, as driverless cars and artificial intelligence continue to draw closer to reality there is one important factor to consider. One example of computers approaching self-sufficiency is Google’s driverless car, which appears to be very close to hitting public roads. While humans are currently a necessary component of data collection and analysis, the threshold for self-sufficient computers is ever approaching. Science in turn has become inexorably linked to large data that is generated and analyzed by computers. Humans have become reliant on computers to process the huge amounts of data we generate. Think about the implications of that question, it’s not even a question that humans will turn to computer technology in order to address the problems of the future. Inevitably the conversation always approached the question of how can we use science and technology to find solutions? In accordance with the problems just listed, the rest of the discussion revolved around coming to grips with the limitations that prevent the scientific community from solving them. These problems included climate change, education reform, and much more. This discussion focused on more than the next big technological advancement, it also addressed up and coming problems and concepts that scientists are trying to come to terms with. Just over a week ago on October 3 rd there was a Connecticut Forum meeting at the Bushnell theatre to discuss the next big things on the horizon of science. His goal is to help schools understand whether or not they do.Current Issues and Scientific Progress put Pressure on Technology and Human Pride Still, Feuer knows that these interventions will have to take place on a school by school basis and they may not always work. "Suddenly they had about 100 names looking at them on a list like, 'These are the kids none of us know,'" Feuer says. Once Panorama supplies schools with this information, it's up to principals and teachers to do something about it, and that, Feuer says, is something not every school has figured out, though some have tried.įor instance, after finding out that many students didn't think any teachers knew their names, one school plastered the entire school's roster on the walls of the teachers lounge and asked teachers to cross off the students they knew. “It’s not."Īnd yet, the technology Panorama has created can only go so far. “That number should be zero,” Feuer says. It’s another for Panorama to tell a school that one fifth of their students don’t think anyone would notice if they didn’t show up for school. It’s one thing to know that attendance is down. The goal of all of Panorama's work is to help schools understand the underlying reasons for their biggest problems. Now, Panorama is taking that one step further, launching a dashboard tool that shows principals and superintendents a summary of how their schools stack up on these seemingly immeasurable qualities. Since it launched in 2012, while Feuer and his co-founders were undergraduates at Yale, Panorama has been designing student and teacher surveys that help schools get to the root of these questions. Things like whether kids feel safe on campus, exhibit self-confidence, or believe that teachers would even remember them a few years down the road.īut just because those qualities are tough to measure, doesn’t mean schools shouldn’t measure them, says Aaron Feuer, CEO of the Mark Zuckerberg-backed edtech company Panorama Education. These are the easy things to measure-the numbers that present themselves in a pretty little bow on a daily or quarterly basis.Īnd yet, the best teachers, parents, and principals know that what truly makes or breaks a student's experience in school is not math and reading scores, but all the touchy-feely, fuzzy stuff. In the No Child Left Behind era, the quality of a school became inextricably tied to test scores-so much so that, in some school districts, test scores and attendance have become some of the only metrics that principals and superintendents keep track of today.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |